Legal Opinion

Pryor v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

*1048We affirm. “Governmental immunity protects defendant from liability for the injurious consequences of official action ‘when [that] action involves the exercise of discretion or expert judgment in policy matters, and is not exclusively ministerial’ ” (Metz v State of New York, 86 AD3d 748, 750 [2011], quoting Haddock v City of New York, 75 NY2d 478, 484 [1990]). By statute, the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (hereinafter DOCCS) is responsible “for the safety, security and control of correctional facilities” (Correction Law § 137 [2]; see Arteaga v State of New York, 72…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Haddock v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Metz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Bartley v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Varela v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loret v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Loret v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API