Legal Opinion

United States v. Forty Barrels & Twenty Kegs of Coca Cola

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 13, 1914No. 2415PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Edward T. Sanford, Judge. Libel by the United States for condemnation of 40 barrels and 20 kegs of Coca Cola, the Coca Cola Company claimant. There was a judgment (191 Eed. 431) denying relief, and the United States brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This' proceeding was brought by the united States to condemn a quantity of syrup called Coca Cola. Forfeiture was claimed under the Pure Food Law (34 U. S. S. L. 768), because the syrup was said to be adulterated and misbranded. The case was tried at great length before a jury; at the conclusion of the trial, the government withdrew certain issues, and upon the two remaining matters, the court instructed a verdict for the Coca Cola Company, the claimant of the property. The sole question presented by this writ of error is whether there was any evidence tending to show…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Market Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Nashville Syrup Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  3. United States v. Allbrook Freezing & Cold Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Washburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API