Legal Opinion

Sugden v. Rothschild

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1931No. Appeal, 80PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

In this action of ejectment, defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff. Admittedly the instruction was correct, unless defendant obtained a valid tax title under the facts hereinafter set forth. As we are satisfied she did not, the judgment must be affirmed.

While plaintiff was the owner of the land in dispute, which was located in the City of Erie, he went to the office of the city treasurer to pay his taxes for the year 1921. The land was assessed at a valuation of $900, but was worth much more. Through some…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Day v. SwansonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Bradford County v. BeardsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Brew v. SharerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Finn v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrews Land Corp's. AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Babcock Lumber Co. v. FaustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Gordon v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Brown, for Use v. LesuerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API