Legal Opinion

Pittsfield National Bank v. Tailer

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the Pittsfield National Bank against William H. Tailer and others. An order was made requiring plaintiff to state separately and number-two alleged causes of action in the complaint, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The final object of this action is to set aside a general assignment made by the firm of Boss, Campbell & Co. to the defendant Tailer, for-the benefit of their creditors. The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the firm, whose execution against their property has been returned unsatisfied. In support of the action it is alleged in the complaint that the assignment is null, and void on its face; and also that it was made with the.intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the assignors, including the plaintiff; and it was for the reason alone that it contained these two statements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Wiles v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Stowell v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Durant v. PiersonNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hasberg v. MosesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Kass v. Garment Center Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Bowman v. TookerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Kass v. Garment Center Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Union Transit Co. v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API