Legal Opinion

State v. Keiper

Union County Court

Decided May 11, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath, C. P. J.

The pertinent parts of the indictment charge Keiper with having unlawfully as an agent, solicitor, surveyor and representative of Warner Eeciprocal Insurers, solicited a contract of fire insurance in Union county and with having directly and indirectly transacted the business of fire insurance, the said Warner Eeciprocal Insurers and the said Tilghman H. Keiper not being specifically authorized to solicit and negotiate and effect, in any manner directly or indirectly, the business of insurance of any kind whatsoever within this state.

It is admitted that “Warner Eeciprocal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schenck v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API