Graham v. City of Asbury Park
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
We affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Freund in Graham v. Asbury Park, 69 N. J. Super. 256 (App. Div. 1961). Since the parties before us have not raised the issue of mitigation (compare D’Elia v. Jersey City, 57 N. J. Super. 466 (App. Div. 1959) with Miele v. McGuire, 31 N. J. 339 (1960)) we find no present occasion for dealing with it. See Lowenstein v. Newark Bd. of Education, 35 N. J. 94, 124 (1961); McGrath v. Jersey City, 70 N. J. Super. 143, 147 (Law Div. 1961). We do, however, repeat the suggestion made in De Marco v. Bd. of Chosen…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Mullane v. McKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
4Cited by20 opinions
- Schock v. Bd. of Rev., Div. Empl. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Sandler v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPRINGFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Calabro v. Campbell Soup Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Kligman v. LautmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- McAleer v. Jersey City Incinerator Auth'yNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.