Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, in the following memorandum:

While a literal construction of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law would require a causal connection between the disability of the infancy and the failure, to file a claim within the time prescribed, long precedent and the policy expressed in Matter of Murray v City of New York (30 NY2d 113) mandates that this statute be read as conferring discretion on the courts vested with discretion to sustain or deny grants of permission for late filing.

We do, however, agree with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Murray v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Baker v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Economou v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Basile v. Union Free School District No. 32Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API