Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Admiral Dewey Stufflebean, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1959No. 16200PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals from final judgment entered for plaintiff for damages resulting from a collision between a car owned and operated by plaintiff and defendant’s switch train. Plaintiff’s action is based upon negligence. The case was tried to a jury.

Defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and again at the close of all of the evidence moved for a directed verdict on the ground that there was no evidence to support a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant or freedom from contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Ruling upon the motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Plumb v. Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. Strom v. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Mast v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  5. Kinney v. LarsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gary R. Banks v. Koehring Company and Farm Division And/or Fox Tractor Division ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad Company v. BreckenridgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Alfred KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Cities Service Oil Co. v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Carstens Plumbing & Heating Co. v. EpleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API