in Re Russell Jay Reger
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.
Russell Jay Reger (Reger), an indigent inmate, appeals from an order dismissing his “Petition [under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202] to Take Deposition to Investigate Potential Claim.” 1 The trial court dismissed the petition because Reger allegedly failed to comply with Rule 202.2(f)(1) and (2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and with § 14.004 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Reger contends in four issues that the trial court abused its discretion 1) by dismissing as moot his motion to request the Attorney General’s office to show its authority to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte RieckCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Office Employees International Union Local 277 v. Southwestern Drug Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Thomas v. Fitzgerald, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlos Lara v. E. Karl Prohl, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Johnathan E. Cooper v. Charles Patrick Reynolds, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
- Reger, Russell JayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Russell Jay Reger v. Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County, Texas and Detective Jerry S. Vennum 803, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Russell Jay Reger v. Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County, Texas and Detective Jerry S. Vennum 803, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011