Legal Opinion

Estey v. MacKenzie Engineering Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1995No. 9212-08572; CA A82218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendants MacKenzie Engineering, Inc. (MEI) and Leonard Krombein, an employee of MEI, alleging negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on a limitation of liability clause in the parties’ contract for professional services. We affirm.

Plaintiff contracted with MEI for a “limited visual review” of a house that he intended to purchase. The contract consisted of one page that set out the estimated contract sum of $200 and the scope of work to be completed. It also…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. K-Lines, Inc. v. Roberts Motor CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mann v. WetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Knappenberger v. Cascade Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Young v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estey v. MacKenzie Engineering Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. J. Lilly, LLC v. Clearspan Fabric Structures International, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  3. Sugarman v. IRZ Consulting, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API