Legal Opinion

United States v. Hump

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 27, 2021No. 3:19-cv-03020Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3:19-CV-03020-RAL Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR Vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID HUMP, and KAREN HUMP, Individually, and d/b/a BEAR COAT BISON, f/k/a Bear Coat Bison LLC, Defendants. The United States brought a lawsuit against David and Karen Hump (collectively “the Humps”) seeking to foreclose on Indian trust land located within the Cheyenne River Sioux Indian Reservation. Doc. 1. The United States filed a motion for summary judgment, Doc. 6, which the Humps oppose, Doc. 19.! For the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dale E. Harper v. Clyde Wallingford Larry Kincheloe W.L. Kautsky an Unnamed Mailroom Staff Member at W.S.P., A/K/A "d.s."Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Missouri Housing Development Commission v. Edward W. Brice, Jr., Paul Goodrich, Joseph TimiltyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Petroff-KlineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Crow Tribal CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API