Legal Opinion
Clardy v. Rapistan Division of Lear Siegler, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 30, 1993No. 1—92—0675PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Giannis
Third-party plaintiff Rapistan Division of Lear Siegler, Inc. (Rapistan), filed a complaint seeking contribution from third-party defendant Kar Products, Inc. (Kar), during the pendency of an underlying negligence suit. The sole issue on appeal is whether Rapistan’s contribution claim against Kar is time-barred.
Plaintiff in the underlying case, Nanette Clardy (Clardy), commenced an action against defendant Rapistan on June 2, 1986. In her two-count complaint, Clardy alleged that she had been injured at her place of employment on June 25, 1985, by equipment manufactured by Rapistan. Count I of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Antunes v. SookhakitchIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Landmarks Preservation Council v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trettenero v. Police Pension Fund of AuroraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Jensen v. East Dundee Fire Protection District Firefighters' Pension Fund Board of TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Bradley v. Sandoz Nutrition Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Chultem v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- Clardy v. RAPISTAN DIV. OF LEAR SIEGLERAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.