Legal Opinion

Hackett v. United Airlines

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1987No. 02575PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections, in the nature of a demurrer, to appellant’s complaint. Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court misread and misapplied Pennsylvania law when it found that appellant’s complaint failed to state a cause of action. Upon review of the relevant pleadings and the arguments of counsel, we now affirm.

Appellant is Frances C. Hackett, who brought suit in Montgomery County in her individual capacity and in her representative capacity as the daughter of Catherine A. Cook, whose remains are the subject…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Yandrich v. RadicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mest v. Cabot Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Culpepper v. Pearl Street Building, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Weiley v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Kearney v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API