Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1981No. 808DC966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it dismissed his notice of appeal. Specifically, he argues that the words of the district judge on pages 15-22 of the record were not such as to constitute the entry of a judgment.

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 58 defines the entry of judgment as follows: “... where judgment is rendered in open court, the clerk shall make a notation in his minutes ... and such notation shall constitute the entry of judgment. ...” The record before us indicates that the judgment in this case was “entered” in open court on 8 August 1980, and that the defendant…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gates v. GatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Patel v. Mid Southwest ElectricCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Gates v. GatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API