Legal Opinion

Castaldo v. Singapore, J. F. Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 29, 1972No. 71-834PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, suffered an adverse jury verdict in a “slip and fall” negligence action. He pursued this appeal and has preserved three points for review, all relating to the failure of the trial judge to give certain jury instructions.

The only portion of the trial transcript brought to this court is the charge conference and the charge as given by the trial court. The trial judge gave the standard jury instructions applicable to the cause, but declined to give three specific instructions requested by the plaintiff because he said they were inappropriate under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crosby v. StubblebineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Direct Transport Company of Florida v. RakaskasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Speight v. DulimbaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Clark v. GrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Perry v. PerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Brant v. BrooksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Rafield v. BenhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API