Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State Ex Rel. Stollings v. Haines

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2002No. 30442Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ALBRIGHT,

Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

(Filed Aug. 5, 2002)

My original intent was to simply concur in the majority opinion. After fully reviewing that opinion, I have elected to concur in part and dissent in part. I concur in the decision with respect to the failure of the record to disclose that the Parole Board complied with the decision of this Court in State ex rel. Carper v. West Virginia Parole Board, 203 W.Va. 583, 509 S.E.2d 864 (1998).

However, I dissent and write separately because I do not agree that the record reveals that the Parole Board (hereinafter *50sometimes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowe v. W. Va. Dept. of CorrectionsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tasker v. MohnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rowe v. WhyteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Carper v. West Virginia Parole BoardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SkaffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API