Legal Opinion

Famigletti v. Neviackas

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 1949PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff, Famigletti, on April 10, 1947, employed the defendant, Neviackas, as a real estate broker to sell the plaintiff's real estate in East Walpole. The defendant obtained Angelo and Carmela Puopolo, husband and wife, as customers at $9,500, which the plaintiff orally agreed to accept. A written contract of sale was drawn, and was signed under seal by the plaintiff and by Angelo Puopolo, but was not signed by Carmela Puopolo. The contract provided for the payment of part of the price by a note signed by Angelo and Carmela, secured by mortgage of the premises sold, and for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Wind Innersole & Counter Co. v. GeilichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Walsh v. FeinsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Checkoway v. Cashman Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Saunders v. Shoe Lace Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Cape Cod Bank & Trust Co. v. LeTendreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Perma-Home Corp. v. NigroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. PhaneufMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Deacy v. First National BankMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API