Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Bagwell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 19, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. March term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

The error assigned by the plaintiff in error is in the ruling of the judge below, in remanding the cause to the justice’s court and ordering a new trial therein. There was á judgment rendered in the justice’s court in favor of Mathis against the defendants in error. The execution proceeding on the judgment was arrested by affidavit of illegality. The grounds of the illegality were: there was no summons in the case against Eliza Bagwell; the note was barred by the statute of limitations; the judgment was not rendered nor entered up at the regular court-ground of the district, but at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emmons, McKee & Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Healey v. DeanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Maddox v. CrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Rome Railroad v. RansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Farmers Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  2. Velvin v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API