Legal Opinion

Belton v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2000No. 25073PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

MOORE, Justice:

We granted a writ of certiorari in this case to review the sole issue whether attorney’s fees should have been awarded under the former version of the Whistleblower Act, 1988 S.C.Act No. 354. The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of such fees. Belton v. State, 330 S.C. 422, 499 S.E.2d 225 (Ct.App.1998). We affirm.

FACTS1

Before trial on her whistleblower action, petitioner Belton accepted an offer of judgment in the amount of $10,000 from respondent (Housing Authority) pursuant to Rule 68, SCRCP. Her acceptance indicated she would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Todd G. Fletcher and Michael Johnson v. City of Fort Wayne, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Black v. Roche Biomedical LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Belton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Steinert v. LanterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Belton v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dowaliby v. ChamblessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. BACON v. STATE AUTO PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
  3. Hueble v. South Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  4. Hueble v. South Carolina Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Phillips and Jordan Inc v. McCarthy Improvement IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API