Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Banales

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 8, 1989No. 13-89-176-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

In this original proceeding, relator, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, seeks a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Manuel Banales, requiring him to rescind his order compelling the discovery of a practice videotape deposition. We conditionally grant the writ.

John Percival, the real party in interest, originally brought suit for hearing loss he sustained while employed by the relator. Dr. Thomas Sumnar was a physician hired by relator to assist in conducting a hearing conservation program. As part of his preparation to testify by videotaped deposition,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Brown & Root U.S.A., Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API