Spradley v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Appellant has filed an extensive and well-briefed motion for rehearing. This has been supplemented by oral argument and also written argument urging said motion. The matters insisted upon are the same as on original hearing. Four questions are vigorously urged.(a) It is insisted, as before, that, as the original way was supposed to be along the dividing lines of the various adjoining landowners, and as the line between the .Combs and Neal surveys, the east line of the one being thé west line of the other, are involved, the location of said line was a question of fact for the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Purvis v. BuseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Nylander v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Sevener v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Nylander v. PotterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995