Legal Opinion

Groom v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; W. L. Barnum, Judge_ Action of ejectment by Lemuel D. Groom against James-Wright. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

This case was tried on the following agreed statement of facts:

“It is hereby agreed by and between the plaintiff and the defendant in the above-entitled action that the facts in this cause are hereinafter stated, and that this cause shall be submitted and heard by the court upon the following statement of facts:
“(1) That Ben Sharper, mentioned in the petition and answer herein as the allottee of the lands described in the petition, is a freedman citizen of the Creek Nation of Indians. (2) That the lands described in the petition, to wit, southeast quarter of the southwest…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. People, Ex Rel. Wood v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. State v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Young v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Scherer v. HulquistSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API