Legal Opinion

Laas v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 2006No. 26799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

John C. Wright (defendant) appeals a judgment for Jim Laas and Colleen Laas (plaintiffs) in an action plaintiffs brought to collect a promissory note given by defendant, and on a counter-claim by defendant to recover amounts defendant previously paid plaintiffs on the promissory note. This court affirms.

Defendant’s son, John C. Wright IV, was charged with criminal offenses that ultimately led to his convictions for murder in the second degree, § 565.021, 1 and armed criminal action, § 571.015. Plaintiff had written a bail bond in the amount of $500,000 on defendant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State on the Information of Reed v. ReardonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Two Pershing Square, L.P. v. BoleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Gilbert v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Kinser v. ElkadiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. EDUCAP, INC. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. Bates, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
  3. DUNTON & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. A & J PRINTING INC., JIMMY L. EAKINS, and EAKINS PRESS, INC., Defendants-Respondents and WILLIAM DUNTON, LISA DUNTON, and ABACUS CPAs, LLC, Third PartyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Kyle Odermann and Audrey Odermann v. Gerald Mancuso, Desarae G. Harrah and Harrah Law, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API