State v. Pope
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari directed to the 2nd District’s opinion reported at 268 So.2d 173 (1972), reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3) (1973), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby
Discharged.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metropolitan Dade Cty. Ta v. State Dept. Hs & MvSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976