Legal Opinion

Hudson Building Supply Co. v. Stulman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 3, 1970No. [No. 281, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

Judge MacDaniel determined the credibility of various witnesses and, weighing their testimony, decided that Hudson Building Supply Company, Inc., the appellant, was estopped to claim the mechanics’ lien on the property of Stulman, appellee, it had sought below to perfect. He said in an opinion filed on August 6,1969 :

“The Court feels that all of the elements and facts of an equitable estoppel are present in this particular case and that Hudson is estopped because of its actions of enforcing a Mechanics’ Lien against Stulman.
“* * * The attorneys for Stulman are hereby directed to draw the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCann v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Suitland Development Corp. v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Ballan v. BallanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Kennedy v. Foley, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Hayman, Adm'r v. MessickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Popham v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Waters v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Johnson v. Assured Employment, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Billman v. Maryland Deposit Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API