Legal Opinion

Sid Street, Jr. v. Arno A. Apel

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1957No. 15633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is taken from a judgment in a patent infringement suit which determined that Letters Patent No. 2,126,-304, covering the hull of a speedboat, issued to Adolph E. Apel and plaintiff August 9, 1938, and owned by plaintiff was valid and infringed, especially as to its claims 5, 8 and 10, by racing boat hulls made and sold and caused to be made and sold by defendant, Sid Street, Jr., and awarding damages against him for said infringement. He contends that the court erred in finding and concluding that his boats, which were made by Richard Hallett infringed the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Unhairing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  2. Willis v. TownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Fauber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
  5. Measuregraph Co. v. Grand Rapids Show Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parmelee Pharmaceutical Company, and William v. Consolazio v. Lawrence C. Zink, D/B/A Zink Safety Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Blankenship v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API