Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Capital Bank of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 3, 1979No. 78-1291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee, Capital Bank of Miami, f/k/a National Industrial Bank of Miami, filed a mortgage foreclosure action alleging that appellants, the Copelands, had defaulted under a note and mortgage. Appellants’ answer denied that appellee was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure, and their primary affirmative defense was that the mortgage and note were void for total want of consideration; appellants also counterclaimed for reformation and rescission on the grounds that the mortgage and note were executed by them in connection with the issuance by appellee bank of an irrevocable letter of credit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eulette v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and BeaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Baader v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Van Scoyoc v. YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Griffin v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ariko v. NicholsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Miranda v. Rbs CitizensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API