Legal Opinion

Vincent Casseus v. Warden E. Emmerich

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 14, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00206Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN VINCENT CASSEUS, Petitioner, OPINION and ORDER v. 26-cv-206-jdp WARDEN E. EMMERICH, Respondent. Petitioner Vincent Casseus, proceeding without counsel, alleges that officials at FCI Oxford denied him procedural due process during disciplinary proceedings for possessing a cellphone. Casseus brings an emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and he seeks restoration of 41 days of good-conduct time. Casseus says that if his good-conduct time is restored, he will be released from custody on April…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Aaron B. Scruggs v. D. Bruce JordanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Clyde Piggie v. Zettie Cotton, Cylde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Garlotte v. FordiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API