Legal Opinion

City of McPherson v. Stucker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 28,916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the court overruling a motion for a judgment on the entire record.

In order better to understand the question presented by this motion the record of the case must be considered. That portion of the record pertinent to our present inquiry may be stated as follows: The city of McPherson, desiring to build a concrete waterproof tower for its system of waterworks, after having plans and specifications prepared for that purpose, let a contract for the work to Stucker, Stucker & Strachan, by the terms of which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stroup v. PepperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. City of Fort Scott v. Penn Lubric Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Ireland v. Linn County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. City of McPherson v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. City of Topeka v. Central Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. Virgil H. Johnson and Rex Bratcher, D/B/A Johnson-Bratcher Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Dennis v. Southeastern Kansas Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. Kansas Turnpike Authority v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Olmstead v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API