Legal Opinion

Eastwood v. DeDomenico (In Re DeDomenico)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided May 15, 2002No. 14-42139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Decision

ALAN JAROSLOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff Laura Eastwood and debtor and defendant Vincent DeDomenico were married from 1986 to 1991. DeDomenico is from a wealthy family; Eastwood has since remarried into a wealthy family.

In 1995, the parties entered into a stipulated judgment resolving their property rights. Under the judgment, DeDomenico was ordered to pay Eastwood an equalizing payment of $1,122,157.00, attorneys’ fees of $27,161.25, and an additional $170,000.00 denominated as “a non-taxable property division” but in fact unpaid spousal support. In this adversary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Paul Chris Gianakas, Debtor. Karen Gianakas v. Paul Chris GianakasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Ollie B. Hadley, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Sonoda v. CabreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Seixas v. Booth (In Re Seixas)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. Dow Agro SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Vaughan v. Meridian National Corp. (In Re Ottawa River Steel)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API