Legal Opinion

State v. Villa

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 2003No. 23,229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

{1} Defendant appeals his convictions for violations of the Water Quality Act (WQA) for discharging in violation of a permit and for causing or allowing another to violate a permit. In this opinion we address whether, in the absence of proof that the permit was in effect at the time of the violations, attempt to commit the violations is a lesser included offense, and whether this Court can remand for sentencing on the lesser included offense. We hold that attempt to commit a violation of the WQA is a lesser included offense in this instance, and we remand to the trial…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Sattazahn v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. ApodacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. DuffyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. GreenwoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. GreenwoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. VillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API