Legal Opinion

Rufus Lee Smith v. The Cincinnati Post & Times-Star

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1973No. 72-1883PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment, D.C., 353 F.Supp. 1126, entered against the plaintiff-appellant in his suit brought under 18 U.S.C. § 2520, which authorizes a civil action by any person whose wire or oral communication is intercepted, disclosed or used in violation of the Federal Wiretap Laws. The appellant was a party to a telephone conversation with one Howard Wunker in which the appellant allegedly indicated that he could arrange a “fix” in a divorce case then pending in the Domestic Relations Court for Hamilton County, Ohio, where the appellant was then employed. Wunker caused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Anthony DilorenzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Cesare VivianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Kaufman v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. National Satellite Sports, Inc. v. Eliadis, Inc., D/B/A Melody Lane Lounge, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., D/B/A Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. TurkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. William Fred PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Anthony Zerilli and Michael Polizzi v. The Evening News AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Chester MeriwetherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API