Davis v. Nutaro

Upon a Petition for Writ of Prohibition we have considered the order of the trial court denying petitioner’s motion for recu-sal of the respondent.

Regardless of whether the motion is legally sufficient under the standards recognized in Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), we conclude that the order of the trial court requires that the Judge disqualify herself. See Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So.2d 440 (Fla.1978); Gieseke v. Moriarty, 471 So.2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

The tnal court, in response to the motion, entered an extensive three page order which argues points raised in the…