Edwards Manufacturing Co. v. Hood
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. Equity jurisdiction extends to protection and relief of parties, where, from any peculiar circumstances, the operation of the general rules of law would he deficient in protecting from anticipated wrong, or relieving for injuries done. Civil Code (1910), § 4519. In so far as the case may relate to anticipated breach of the contract by defendant, the evidence was sufficient to show ground for such anticipation.
2. The contract of sale of capital stock in a corporation involved in this case contained stipulations imposing mutual obligations between the parties. One obligation of the vendor to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Felch v. HooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Faughnan v. BashlorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Hamil v. FlowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Sweat v. ArlineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Pendley v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Blount v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Tow v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.