Legal Opinion
G.B. Goldman Paper Co. v. United Paperworkers International Union, Local 286
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 3, 1997No. Civil Action 95-7319PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff G.B. Goldman Paper Company (“the Company”) brings this Motion for Summary Judgment requesting me to vacate an arbitration award which overturned the termination of Mr. Fred Golden (“Golden”) and reinstated him with back pay and all benefits to which he is entitled under the collective bargaining agreement. Although the arbitrator found credible evidence that Golden harassed, intimidated, threatened, and assaulted his fellow employees, the arbitrator reinstated Golden because the Company did not consistently follow nor apply its own procedures…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- ConocoPhillips Co. v. HenryDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2007
- Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cox v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA DHSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- FREIGHTLINER, LLC v. Teamsters Local 305District Court, D. Oregon · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.