Legal Opinion

Watts v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1994No. CV-93-0342-PRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether an otherwise timely petition for special action seeking review in the court of appeals of a decision of the Industrial Commission becomes untimely because the filing fee was paid after the time for filing the petition expired. We hold that it does not.

BACKGROUND

This is a workers’ compensation case. On May 10,1993, a “decision upon review” under AR.S. § 23-943 was entered affirming an award against Watts. On June 7,1993; with*513in the 30-day period provided by § 23-943(H), Watts presented to the clerk of the court of appeals a petition for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Emilio v. vip/auto-ownersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Gonzalez v. interstate/xl SpecialtyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API