Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Department of Environmental Quality

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2004No. Docket No. 248241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FER CURIAM.

Petitioners appeal by leave granted the circuit court order affirming the hearing referee’s grant of summary disposition for respondent Department of *569Environmental Quality (DEQ) pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4), lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

The facts of this case are largely undisputed. In late June 2001, petitioners had substantially completed construction of a garage addition that was built on existing pilings.1 On July 5, 2001, the DEQ sent petitioners a notice of violation informing them that the garage addition was built in violation of the permit requirements of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  2. Horn v. City of Mackinac IslandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
  3. Oakland County v. Department of Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Donald J Trump v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Maxwell v. DEQMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API