Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sperling
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1956No. 14334_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.2d 317
Charles B. SMITH, as Special Administrator of the Estate of
Edward S. Birn, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Milton SPERLING, Harry M. Warner, Jack L. Warner, United
States Pictures, Inc., and Warner Bros. Pictures,
Inc., Appellees.
No. 14334.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 21, 1956.
Certiorari Granted Oct. 15, 1956.
See 77 S.Ct. 98.
Moss, Lyon & Dunn, Herman H. Levy, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Freston & Files, Eugene D. Williams, Ralph E. Lewis, Los Angeles, Cal., Oliver B. Schwab, Beverly Hills, Cal., Arthur Livingston, Hollywood, Cal., for appellees.
Before STEPHENS, FEE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Central R. Co. of NJ v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Duke & Benedict, Inc. v. WolsteinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993