Legal Opinion

Branham v. Rohm & Haas Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided June 4, 2010No. 3590Published

1Opinion of the Court

TERESHKO, J.,

Appellant, non-party Dow Chemical Company, appeals this court’s findings and order dated April 26, 2010, denying its motion to quash the subpoena of plaintiff Joanne Branham, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Franklin Branham to compel the appearance of a Dow corporate designee for the purpose of securing trial testimony on the issue of how certain epidemiological studies were conducted.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This is one of 30 individual actions involving claims that chemical contamination from a chemicals manufacturing facility in Northern Illinois caused brain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OKC LTD.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Battuello v. Camelback Ski Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. DuPuy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API