Fuller v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The petitioner, Jancis L. Fuller, appeals from the habeas court’s dismissal of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that the conditions of her confinement at York Correctional Institution in Niantic did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment within the meaning of the eighth amendment to the United States constitution.1 We disagree with the petitioner and affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of the petitioner’s appeal.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Santiago v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. FullerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Faraday v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Faraday v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Faraday v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006