Shelton v. Trigg

RANDOLPH, Special Judge.

I concur in the disposition of this case as set out in the opinion of Associate Justice HALL.

With the question of the unconscionableness of the contract known as the “partnership contract” this court has nothing to do, as no issue presented calls in question such partnership contract. The only questions before this court are the questions of duress, with the incidental issues — estoppel and ratification — and whether or not the last question is in such form that this court can pass upon it.

Duress of property threatened is the issue here presented. That a party may…