Legal Opinion

Kuphal v. Kuphal

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.

The special guardian for the defendant moves, as it was his duty to do. under the circumstances, to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the court has no jurisdiction either of the person of the defendant or of the subject-matter of the action.

The action was brought allegedly to annul, but in reality to dissolve, a marriage on the ground of the defendant’s incurable insanity. The facts are undisputed. The parties, then residents of the State of New Jersey, were married there in June, 1920. They continued to live there as man and wife until February, 1932, when the defendant, with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. McKnight v. DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Ambruster v. AmbrusterNew York Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. County Bank of Santa Cruz v. VerversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API