Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Chapman

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1865PublishedCited by 18 opinions

~y| OTIOH to set aside a verdict on account of the miscon- . JiL duct of the officer having charge of the jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Sutherland, . J.

With some hesitation I have come to the conclusion that the verdict in this case must be set aside for misconduct of the officer having the jury in charge. Bird, one of the jurors, in his affidavit, states expressly, that the officer “stated to them (the jury,) that the court had adjourned and' left orders for him (said officer,) to lock up the jury and keep them all night, unless they agreed upon a verdict ; that the case ivas clear for the plaintiff, and that the jury had tetter agree and go home ; that if they did not, soon, he should lock the jury up for the night.” That…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. McBean v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wiggins v. DownerNew York Supreme Court · 1884
  3. James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In re VanderbiltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Jefson v. Crosstown Street RailwayNew York Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API