Legal Opinion

Forsyth v. American Maize Products Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1915No. , 8,419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Charles W. Hanley, Special Judge. Action by the American Maize Products Company against Charles B. Shedd and others, in which Oliver O. Forsyth and others filed petition to intervene. From a judgment denying the right to intervene, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellants the right to intervene in the suit of American Maize Products Company against Charles B. Shedd, et al., in the Lake Superior Court. The defendants in that suit are appellants in. Shedd v. American Maize Products Co. (1915), 60 Ind. App. -, 108 N. E. 610, which case has been considered and determined in connection with this appeal. The principal facts fully appear in the opinion in that case and need not be repeated here.

It appears that on the trial of- the case of American Maize Products Company v. Shedd, et al., the hearing of evidence was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Grafton v. . MoirNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Roush v. RoushIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Northern Indiana Land Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estep v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. School District of Ferndale v. Royal Oak Township School District No. 8Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Abeele v. RuseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. South Bend Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. In Re Lambert's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API