Legal Opinion

Lundy v. Hazlett

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1927No. 26375PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, P. J.

J. I. Lundy appeals from a judgment of five thousand eight hundred ninety-eight dollars and sixty-seven cents recovered against him by the appellee, Mrs. Lillie M. Hazlett, as damages in an action of deceit for false representation by Lundy that a certain tract of land contained three hundred sixty-six acres, which he sold to appellee for eighty dollars per acre, whereas the tract was about fifty acres short of the acreage represented by the seller,' Lundy, to the purchaser, Mrs. Hazlett.

The suit is not one to recover upon the warranty deed, but is an action in tort for deceit of the seller…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buckner v. CalcoteMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Vincent v. CorbettMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Alexander v. MeekMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McNeer v. NorfleetMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. FurlongMississippi Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Citifinancial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Reich v. Jesco, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Dunn v. DentMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Howard v. Citifinancial IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Lady v. Jefferson Pilot Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API