Tucker v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
The defendant, Darrell Bruce Tucker, appeals his conviction of the offense of statutory rape. Held:
1. It is contended that the guilty verdict “is contrary to the weight of evidence, law, and the principles of justice and equity.” “On appeal, this court cannot look to the weight of the evidence, it can only determine if there is [sufficient] evidence to authorize the verdict.” Morris v. State, 150 Ga. App. 310 (3) (257 SE2d 378) (1979). The defendant argues that the statement of the complainant was neither sufficiently supported, nor corroborated by the testimony of the other…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boyd v. DuttonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Mullins v. LavoieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Copeland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Meeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.