Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mary E. Barger, Cross-Appellant v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 13, 1983No. 81-2262Published

1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge

To the dual holding1 that the helicopter was not a “vessel” and Barger, its pilot, was not a “seaman”, I must respectfully dissent.

To narrow the point of difference, I wish to make clear the extensive areas in which I am in full agreement with Judge Rubin’s scholarly analysis. Without a doubt, 43 U.S.C. § 1333(b) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) brings into play § 933(i) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA) which prescribes the exclusive remedy for injury and death cases by the Act. I quite agree that Barger’s death was the “result of operations…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. GaudetSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API