Legal Opinion

Battaglia v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*385The requirement that the petitioner submit to a return-to-work drug test pursuant to the respondent’s Drug Policy and Instruction, agreed to by the petitioner’s union in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, contrary to the finding of the trial court, was not unconstitutional. Certain constitutional rights of individual public employees represented by collective bargaining agents may be waived by the consent of those agents (Matter of Briggs v Stangl, 222 AD2d 672, 673, citing, Antinore v State of New York, 49 AD2d 6, 10, affd 40 NY2d 921; Buffalo Police Benevolent Assn. v City of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antinore v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Antinore v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Briggs v. StanglAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anonymous v. Commissioner of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API