Legal Opinion
DeJESUS v. Astrue
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 2011No. 10 Civ. 5522(AJP)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Carlos DeJesus brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying DeJesus Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). (Dkt. No. 2: Compl.) The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). (Dkt. No. 10: Notice of Motion; see also Dkt. No. 11: Comm’r Br.) DeJesus did not respond to the motion. The parties have consented to decision of…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Craig v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Suarez v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Antonelli v. KijakaziDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Arch v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Blachorsky v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.