Legal Opinion

Wigle v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 21, 1959No. Civ. A. 17640PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge,

sitting by designation.

The Court accepts as findings of fact the stipulation and agreement of facts between the parties, submitted through their respective attorneys, September 1, 1959.

Conclusions of Law.

With respect to the law governing this case, the Court finds the following controlling rules of law;

(1.) Insurance policies cover only risks, not certainties. Therefore, a policy insuring against “perils of the sea” covers only fortuitous events resulting in loss, rather than events which must happen. Perils of the sea must be “of the sea” and not merely “on the sea”.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Providence Washington Ins. Co. v. LovettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1953
  2. Baggaley v. Aetna Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ronald Goodman v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  3. CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  4. Founders' Insurance Company, a Corporation v. H. J. Rogers and R. G. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Sipowicz v. WimbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API